|
virtual edge
PREMIO Sites
Vol. 1/No. 14
|
You are visitor
Archive of
volume 1, number 14 for August 17, 1998. Go back to
current issue.
Things are different today with servers being targeted at small businesses
as well as large corporations. This mean a server must be easy to setup and maintain.
Small businesses must be able to maintain the server without a full time MIS staff. There are
different types of server available, depending on the number of users you
wish to accomodate and the task(s) you want the server to perform. The
three things that differentiates a server and a highend desktop PC are
as follows: 1) management; 2) high performance I/O subsystem; and
3) redundancy. It's important to closely examine these key three points
before buying a server.
Management allows the system administrator to control and monitor
the server without have to be physically in front of the machine.
This is a must since a server, once configured, should be locked away
for security purposes.
Most desktop systems today use the less expensive IDE hard drive for
storage. For a server, SCSI (UltraWide or Ultra2) is a must. A SCSI
subsystem provides better performance and lower processor utilization.
A good I/O subsystem is imperative for performance. A server with a
poorly configurd I/O subsystem will always be slow. In addition, SCSI
drives may be configured for a fault tolerance RAID subsystem.
Redundancy is an important component of a server. Hardware, not matter
the quality, will, sooner or later, fail. For a critical environment,
Murphy's Law always apply. Fortunately, most servers, even entry
level ones, today are equipped with redundant power supplies.
It is important to note the specs listed below for the different classes
of server are not set in stone; they are merely recommendations provided
to a user as a basic guide.
Intel is proposing a new form designed specifically for workstation
systems. Similar to the AT and ATX form factors designed for desktop
computing, WTX will be aimed at highend workstations instead. As with the
ATX specs, WTX will be an open standard supported by leading companies
such as Compaq, HP, and IBM.
As processing power increases, and multimedia components such as 3D
graphics and rendering gets faster, there is a need to fill the gap
between a desktop computer and a highend server system. Workstation class
systems are typically those by offered by Silicon Graphics (SGI)
and Sun MicroSystems. The starting price of these systems is typically
$10,000 and above. Because of this high price tag, workstations are
out of the range for most people.
Due to the advancements make by Intel and various PC makers, today's
highend desktop's performance rivals that of an entry or mid level
SGI or Sun workstation. Intel proposed the WTX form factor to advance
the PC workstation platform. Due to the high profit margin of the
workstation market, Intel wants to help Compaq, HP, and other PC
manufacturers penetrate the workstation class PC segment.
The WTX initial specs calls out for the following items:
Related links:
But because it did not have any L2 cache, the Celeron lags in performance
when compared to the AMD K6 or K6-2 or Cyrix M2. Intel launched the
Celeron at 266MHz, which they quickly moved to 300Mhz. Even at 300MHz,
the Celeron was no match for the lower cost AMD K6-2. Perhaps Intel
released the Celeron prematurely, but they had to release a CPU that
was price competitive with the AMD/Cyrix processor.
Even before Intel was putting the finishing touches on the Celeron/300,
the next generation Celeron with 128K L2 cache was in the works. Intel's
initial plan was to release this new Celeron in Q1/1999. But most likely
due to intense competition from AMD and Cyrix, Intel will be release their
Celeron/333A by the end of Q3 of this year or beginning of Q4. The "A"
at the end of the clock speed will allow consumers to differentiate between
the cache and non-cache version.
The important thing to note about the 128K L2 cache is it is running at
full CPU speed. The L2 cache on Pentium II processors, not including
the Xeon, only runs at half the CPU speed. This mean that the
performance of a Celeron/333A with 128K L2 cache is almost equivalent to
a Pentium II/333 with 512K L2 cache! The speed of the Celeron L2 cache
makes up for its lack of size. This will allow Intel to compete at
a price point similar to the AMD K6-2 and Cyrix M2. Watch for the
sub $1,000 (or even sub $800) market to really heat up this coming
Christmas.
Related links:
REDMOND (BNN)--World leaders reacted with stunned silence as Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) conducted an underground nuclear test at a secret facility in eastern Washington state. The device, exploded at 9:22 am PDT (1622 GMT/12:22 pm EDT) today, was timed to coincide with talks between Microsoft and the US Department of Justice over possible antitrust action.
"Microsoft is going to defend its right to market its products by any and all necessary means," said Microsoft CEO Bill Gates. "Not that I'm anti-government" he continued, "but there would be few tears shed in the computer industry if Washington were engulfed in a bath of nuclear fire."
Scientists pegged the explosion at around 100 kilotons. "I nearly dropped my latte when I saw the seismometer" explained University of Washington geophysicist Dr. Whoops Blammover, "At first I thought it was Mt. Rainier, and I was thinking, damn, there goes the mountain bike vacation."
In Washington, President Clinton announced the US Government would boycott all Microsoft products indefinitely. Minutes later, the President reversed his decision. "We've tried sanctions since lunchtime, and they don't work," said the President. Instead, the administration will initiate a policy of "constructive engagement" with Microsoft.
Microsoft's Chief Technology Officer Nathan Myrhvold said the test justified Microsoft's recent acquisition of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation from the US Government. Not only did Microsoft acquire "kilograms of weapons grade plutonium" in the deal, said Myrhvold, "but we've finally found a place to dump those millions of unsold copies of Microsoft Bob."
Myrhvold warned users not to replace Microsoft NT products with rival operating systems. "I can neither confirm nor deny the existence of a radioisotope thermoelectric generator inside of every Pentium II microprocessor," said Myrhvold, "but anyone who installs an OS written by a bunch of long-hairs on the Internet is going to get what they deserve."
The existence of an RTG in each Pentium II microprocessor would explain why the microprocessors, made by the Intel Corporation, run so hot. The Intel chips "put out more heat than they draw in electrical power" said Prof. E. E. Thymes of MIT. "This should finally dispell those stories about cold fusion."
Rumors suggest a second weapons development project is underway in California, headed by Microsoft rival Sun Microsystems. "They're doing all of the development work in Java," said one source close to the project. The development of a delivery system is said to be holding up progress. "Write once, bomb anywhere is still a dream at the moment."
Meanwhile, in Cupertino, California, Apple interim-CEO Steve Jobs was rumored to be in discussion with Oracle CEO Larry Ellison about deploying Apple's Newton technology against Microsoft. "Newton was the biggest bomb the Valley has developed in years," said one hardware engineer. "I'd hate to be around when they drop that product a second time."
In the tradition of the what's hot and what's not list, or Wired's
Tired/Wired list...
Do you have an idea or a topic you'd like to see in the upcoming issue
of virtual edge? Just drop an email to calvin@premiopc.com.
Copyright © 1998 PREMIO Computer, Inc. |